Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Agriculture Sciences

Effect of Holes Diameter and Speed of Die on the Performance of Machine and Feed Pellet Quality

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Basim Aboud Abbas 1
Abdulrazzak A. Jasim 2
Luma K. Bander 3

1 Department of Animal Production, College of Agriculture, University of Diyala, Iraq

2 Department of Agricultural Machines and Equipment, College of Agricultural Engineering Ssciences, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

3 Department of Animal Production, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

https://doi.org/10.33794/qjas.2024.154582.1191
Abstract
The aim of this study to evaluate the effects of die holes diameter and speed of die on the performance of machine and feed pellet quality. Machine productivity (Kg.h-1), consumed power (kW), pellet durability (%) and pellet bulk density (g.cm-3) was studied. The study factors consisted of three diameter of die holes (3, 4, and 5 mm), and three speeds die (280, 300, and 320 rpm). Results showed with increasing of die holes diameter from 3 to 4 and to 5 mm give a significant increase in machine productivity, while consumed power, pellet durability and pellet bulk density a significant decreased. By increasing the die speed, from 280 to 300 then to 320 rpm, the machine productivity increased significantly, while consumed power, pellet durability, and pellet bulk density decreased significantly. The highest machine productivity 86.90 Kg.h-1, less consumed power 2.34 Kw recorded with die holes diameter of 5 mm and speeds of 320 rpm, while die holes diameter 3 mm and speed of die 280 rpm recorded the highest pellet durability 91.96% and pellet bulk density 0.6383 g.cm-3. It was concluded that the die holes diameter and die speed have a significant effect in the performance of machine and the pellet produced.

Keywords

Machine productivity
Consumed power
Pellet durability
Pellet bulk density
Crossmark
Subjects
  1. Gulizia, J. P., McConnell, A. D., Strobeck, R. E., Broadwater, C. M., Guzman, E. G., Simões, C. T., & Downs, K. M. (2024). Applied Research Note: The impact of retention time during the conditioning process of a broiler starter diet on performance, apparent metabolizable energy, and apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 33(3), 100435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2024.100435
  2. Iravani, S., Aziz-Aliabadi, F., & Vakili, R. (2024). Feed processing: a review of the impacts of conditioning time and temperature on feed quality and broilers performance. World's Poultry Science Journal, 1-23.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2024.2341276
  3. Abbas, B. A., Jasim, A. A., & Bander, L. K. (2023). Effect of Particle Size and Die Holes Diameter in the Machine on Broiler Feed Pellets Quality. Iraqi Journal of Market Research and Consumer Protection, 15(2), 39-47.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.28936/jmracpc15.2.2023.
  4. Meinerz, C., Ribeiro, A. M. L., Penz Jr, A. M., & Kessler, A. D. M. (2001). Energy level and pelleting on performance and carcass yield of pair-fed broilers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 30, 2026-2032.‏ https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982001000800011
  5. Reimer, L. (1992). Northern Crops Institute feed mill management and feed manufacturing technology short course. California Pellet Mill Co.: Crawfordsville, IN.‏
  6. Jannasch, R., Quan, Y., & Samson, R. (2001). A process and energy analysis of pelletizing switchgrass. Final Report, Prepared by Resource Efficient Agricultural Production (REAP-Canada), www. reap-canada. com.‏
  7. Muramatsu, K., Massuquetto, A., Dahlke, F., & Maiorka, A. (2015). Factors that affect pellet quality: a review. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 9(2), 717-722. http://doi:10.17265/2161-6256/2015.09.002
  8. Wilson, T. O. (2010). Factors affecting wood pellet durability.‏ A Thesis in Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Master of Science, Pennsylvania State University.
  9. Baker, M. M. A. (2016). A Study of Some Factors Affecting The Manufacturing of Livestock Feed Pellets From Aagricultural Residues. Doctoral dissertation, Zagazig University.‏
  10. Peng, J, Y., Wu, S.J. Shi, B. B. Peng & Y. Sun. (2011). FEA on the Roller Bracing Structure of Pellet Mill. Key Engineering Materials 499, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.499.85
  11. C. E., M. Saensukjaroenphon, J. T. Gebhardt, C. R. Stark, & C. B. Paulk. (2021). Effects of conditioning temperature and pellet mill die speed on pellet quality and relative stabilities of phytase and xylanase. Translational Animal Science, 5(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab043
  12. Ali, A. M., Ali, A. A., & Abbas, B. A. (2024). Effect of shelling time and Sheller feeding rate of locally Sheller in some mechanical and physical traits of the process of Maize shelling. Kufa Journal for Agricultural Sciences, 16(1), 65-72.‏ https://doi.org/10.36077/kjas/2024/v16i1.10766
  13. Yousif, L. A., Mohamed, M. Y. & Ahmed, M. A. A. (2022). Energy use analysis for sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production in the mechanized rainfed schemes eastern Sudan. Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal, 14(2), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.52951/dasj.22140205
  14. Kaddour, U. A. (2003). Development of a local pelleing machine to product fish feed mill cook pellet. The 11th Annual conference of Misr Society of Agricultural engineering, 538-556.
  15. Fahrenholz, A. C. (2012). Evaluating Factors Affecting Pellet Durability and Energy Consumption in a Pilot Feed Mill and Comparing Methods for Evaluating Pellet Durability. Doctorate of Philosophy Thesis. Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
  16. Abbas, B. A. (2017). The Effect of Components and Moisture Contents of the Diet on Some Physical Quality Properties of Pellets Manufactured as Chickens Ration. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Research, 22(3), 94-100.
  17. Abdullah, M. K., Abbas, B. A., & Sattar, S. A. (2010). An Evaluation of a Locally Produced Instrument to Measure feed Pellet Durability. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(3), 512-526.‏
  18. Radwan, M., Zaki, R. I., El-Said, A. F., & Metwally, K. A. (2021). Impact of Die Surface Holes Distribution Patterns of Fish Feed Extruder on Performance Indicators and Pellets Quality. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 12(5), 337-343.‏ https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2021.178990
  19. Abbas, B. A., & Ali, A. K. A. (2010). Effect of grinding fineness and meal moisture in some properties for Fish Feeding pellet. Aanbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(4), 120-127.
  20. Opoku, A., M. D. Shaw, L. G. Tabil, D. Pulkinen and B. J. Crerar. (2007). Effect of Whole Canola Inclusion on Physical Quality Characteristics of Feed Pellets Processed from Reground Alfalfa, Barley, and Canola Grains. Applied Engineering in Agricultur, 23(1), 77-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.22321
  21. (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry .National Research Council .9 rev. ad. Natl. Acad. Press Washington. DC.
  22. Abbas, B. A. & Bader, B. R. (2016). Comparison between Manual and Mechanical Mixing of Feed Samples. Euphrates Journal of Agricultural Science, 8(Special), 197-202.
  23. Idan, F., T. N. N. Nortey, C. B. Paulk, R. S. Beyer, & R. Stark. (2020). Evaluating the effect of feeding starters crumbles on the overall performance of broilers raised for 42 days. JAPR: Research Report. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 29 (3), 692-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2020.05.003
  24. (1997). Cubes, Pellet, and Crumbles-Definitions and Methods for Determining Density, Durability, and Moisture Content. ASAE Standard S269.4. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
  25. (2009). SAS/STAT/ User’s Guide for Personal computers, Release 6.12, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  26. Ali, M. A., Ali, A. A., Abbas, B. A., & Lateef, Z. A. A. (2019). Study and evaluation of the process of grinding the yellow maize grains by using chains for locally developed hammer mill. Plant Archives, 19(1), 1887-1892.‏
  27. Abbas, B. A., Jasim, A. A., & Bander, L. K. (2023). Manufacturing and Testing a Double Action Feed Pellet Durability Measuring Device. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1259(1), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1259/1/012126
  28. Al-Bahnasawy, A. (2012). Lectures on preparing and trading agricultural crops for export. Open Education Centre. Department of Agricultural Engineering, faculty of Agriculture, Banha University.
  29. Abbas, B. A. (2009). The Effect of Mash Moisture and Die Holes on Fish Feed Pellet Mincer Performance.‏ Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal, 1(1), 285-291.
  30. Behnke, K. C. (2001). Factors influencing pellet quality. Feed Technology, 5(4), 19-22.
  31. De Blas C., & Wiseman, J. (1998). The nutrition of the rabbit. Wallingford, CBAI Publ. UK, 344.
  32. Abbas, B. A., Ali, A. A. A., & AL-Khashali, M. S. (2011). Effect of die specification in machine energy electrical consumption and some physical characters for Feed pellet. Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences, 11(2), 320-325.
  33. Fasina, O. O. (2008). Physical properties of peanut hull pellets. Bioresource technology, 99(5), 1259-1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.041
  34. Al-Juboory, M. K. A., and Abbas, B. A. (2009). Effect of Some Manufacturing Conditions on Fish Pellet Quality. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 40(3), 86-97.‏
  35. Abbas, B. A. (2022). Effect of Forming Holes and Moistening Water Temperature on Some physical Quality Characteristics of Poultry Feed Pellets.‏ Al-Mukhtar Journal of Sciences, 37 (3), 284-290. https://doi.org/10.54172/mjsc.v37i3.531
  36. Lowe, R. (2005). Judging pellet stability as part of pellet quality. Feed Technology, 9 (2), 15 -19.
  37. Rolfe, L, A, H .E. Huff & Hsieh. (2000). The effect of processing condition on the quality of extruded catfish feed. American society of agricultural engineers, ASAE. 43(6), 1737- 1743. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.3076
  38. Rokey, G., R. Strathman & Plantter. (2002). Pelleted Livestock Feed Production - Process Description, WENGER MFG. INC.
Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Agriculture Sciences
Volume 14, Issue 2
December 2024
Page 59-68

  • Receive Date 23 October 2024
  • Revise Date 30 November 2024
  • Accept Date 05 December 2024